Why Hasn’t Michigan’s Result Been Called?

rp_1200px-Seal_of_the_President_of_the_United_States.svg_.png8 November was 13 days ago and counting; and all but one state were called. Trump leads Clinton in Michigan by nearly 12,000 votes, yet no major news agency has called it for Trump. As for Michigan, according to the IBD, the state has already deemed Trump the winner

Could the answer be wrapped up in the democrat assault on the electoral process and 2016 results itself? Electors are being bombarded by a concerted democrat campaign to get them to change their votes away from Donald Trump and it’s happening in Arizona, Georgia, Idaho, Tennessee, Iowa and even Michigan.

Could the delay in calling Michigan be tied to the same effort to undercut the American voter and to steal the election for Hillary? Michigan is a deep blue state. If enough “lost” Hillary ballots can be manufactured by her campaign to keep its 16 votes from going to Trump it makes it that much easier to turn the election to Hillary when the electors formally cast their votes on 19 Dec.

This democrat effort is bound to fail, but the mere fact that Michigan hasn’t been called adds fuel to the fire of Hillary activists.

It’s well past due, call the race, Trump 306, Hillary 232: CHECKMATE!

UPDATE: Michigan was finally called for Donald Trump, but on the heals of adding its 16 electoral votes to push President Elect Trump to 306, Hillary Clinton’s Campaign announced that it is joining failed Green Party Candidate Jill Stein in calling for a recall in PA, WI and MI. Stein is claiming vote tampering, and chose three states that would turn the election in Clinton’s favor. Ironically, if Stein had not run in the first place, Hillary may have prevailed on 8 Nov. Perhaps the recount is her way of saying that she’s sorry?

Clinton Wikileaks Revelations

NOTE: So much crying about how the Russians hacked these emails yet Clinton says it’s impossible anybody hacked her illicit home-brew email server???


  • Podesta called Sen Bernie Sanders a Doofus
  • Focus group tested that Obama’s father was a Muslim
  • President Obama know about Hillary’s secret emails, used pseudonym to communicate
  • Asked potential voters about Obama’s past cocaine use
  • Campaign believed Obama committed voter fraud in 2008
  • Obama knew about Clinton’s private email server
  • Aides thought Obama’s remarks about private server didn’t make sense
  • Bernie’s healthcare plan: “His actual proposal sucks, but we live in a leftie alternative universe”
  • Hilllary’s Campaign/DMC rigged primaries against Sanders

Gross Hypocrisy

  • Clinton has “Public and Private position” on issues
  • Clinton wanted Obamacare to “Unravel”
  • Campaign found women paid less than men at Clinton Foundation
  • Podesta listed potential VP Candidates by racial and gender “Food Groups”
  • Clinton claimed Saudi Arabia and Qatar funded ISIS, but still took money from them
  • Clinton comments to Brazilian bank that her dream was a hemispheric trade zone with “open trade and open borders.”
  • Moroccan King paid Clinton Foundation $12M for her to attend event in Morocco
  • Bill Clinton received $1M “birthday gift” from Qatar, while Hillary Sec State
  • Clinton showed concern about vetting refugees, knew ISIS would infiltrate Syrians
  • Clinton bragged about being invited to Putin’s “Inner Sanctum”
  • Clinton praises Putin “An Engaging and Very Interesting Conversationalist”
  • Clinton said she’s removed from “Struggles of Middle Class”
  • Clinton attacked Catholics and Evangelicals (Catholicism is “an amazing bastrdization of the faith.”
  • Clinton Campaign manager (Podesta) set up two front groups to instigate a revolution within the Catholic Church, a Catholic Spring
  • Clinton admitted Syria no-Fly Zone would be very difficult
  • Clinton went back and forth over Keystone Pipeline
  • Clinton said Fracking was a “Gift” in paid speech
  • Clinton praised Wall Street in paid speeches
  • Clinton supported plan that would cut social security
  • Paid people to incite vilolence at Trump events
  • Conspired to hide emails from Congress
  • Believed Iran Nuclear agreement was “…the greatest appeasement since Chamberlain gave Czechoslovakia to Hitler.”

Media/Government Collusion

  • rp_Minion-Media-379x1024.pngPolitico reporter offered campaign chance to edit story
  • 37 Page Poll Rigging Operations Guide
  • CNBS’s John Harwood offered advice
  • NYT allowed quote edits
  • Boston Globe pumped up campaign
  • Univision pressured to attack Trump
  • MSNBC producer praised Clinton
  • Campaign bragged about media support
  • Donna Brazile leaked Town Hall/Debate question
  • Campaign colluded with DOJ and State Department over released documents
  • “Off the recotd” dinner with 25 press attendees”
  • Glen Thrush from Politico admits to being a Hillary “Hack”

Hillary and Underling Thoughts of Democrats/Americans

  • Podesta called Latinos “Needy”, Latino outreach is “taco bowl engagement”
  • Called other liberals “Pompous”, “Naive”, “Dumb”, “Radical”, “Freeks who need to Get A Life”
  • Clinton Campaign wants “unaware” and “compliant” citizenry
  • Donald Trump supporters are “a basket of deplorables” and “irredeemable”
  • “Clinton’s treatement of Dept State agents on her protective detail was so contemptuous that many of them sought reassignment or employment elsewhere”
  • Most blacks and Muslims will fail no matter the situation

Clinton Campaign Staff Revelations

  • Podesta wished San Bernadino shooter was named “Chris”
  • Mook called Clintons taxes and health “Hyper Sensitive issues”
  • Clinton hated using phrase “Everyday Americans”
  • Hillary needs a podium, unable to Walk around
  • Hillary called “Spacey”, “Doesn’t seem to know what planet we are all living in”
  • Staff says she is “arrogant” and has a “character problem”

Sources: Wikileaks -John Podesta’s Purported hacked account emails, Hannity/Fox News, Millennium Report, Lifezette

Other Clinton Scandal Summaries:

The Three Big 2016 Election Issues (Part 2)

Sustaining American Rule of Law:

  1. Constitution (Source of American Exceptionalism): The United States Constitution is the source (center of gravity) http://conservativegovernment.net/americas-center-gravity/ for Americas success. The 2016 election is a fundamental choice between sustaining the Rule of Law and the Constitution vs undermining them both in favor of a progressive, socialist utopia. Protecting the Constitution begins with sustaining the legitimacy of the Supreme Court.
    1. SCOTUS Nominees: Sustaining the Constitution entails appointing Justices that believe in the supremacy of the Constitution, and maintain an originalist view. Judges that legislate from the bench imperil the Constitution. Sadly, democrats appoint judges that don’t appreciate the Constitution, and seek to re-write it at every turn.
      1. Fed Judge, US Constitution Outdated
      2. Ginsburg to Egypt, don’t model your constitution after the US.
      3. Unaccompanied Minors committing horrific crimes.
    2. Restrictions on Freedom of Speech (political correctness): Freedom of speech is central to a free society. The progressive movement, embodied in the democrat party, successfully pushed political correctness to stifle speech against their agenda. The 2016 election is one that pits Donald Trump, and anti-political correctness candidate, against Hillary Clinton, the ultimate purveyor of PC. Freedom of Speech is one of the four First Amendment Rights for a reason, as it underpins liberty. The EU has laws preventing political criticisms, and progressives would love to institute them in America.
      1. Think this is far fetched? Democrats are already trying to suppress free speech using intimidation tactics and threats of imprisonment.
  • 2nd Amendment (If democrats can destroy this right, then what other rights can they destroy?). Democrats are out to destroy the Second Amendment. They can’t kill it all at once, so they are using a strategy of chipping away at it a piece at a time. If they can limit/eliminate this right, without a Constitutional Amendment, what right will they go after next?
  1. Freedom of Assembly at rallies: Recently Americas seen a new and violent attack on the Freedom of Assembly. Radical, violent elements like Black Lives Matter, The New Black Panther Party, Move-On.Org etc. have funded protests ending in attacks on GOP voters. Security concerns, and expectations of violence in Cleveland may, by design, overshadow the GOP Convention. Intimidation and violence aimed to keep Americans home instead of attending political events is antithetical to liberty and the First Amendment.
  1. Executive Branch Limitations/Executive Orders: Executive orders, as abused by President Obama, undermine the separation of powers in the Constitution. Laws are made by the Congress, the President is supposed to execute them. This president continually goes around the constitution by using extra-executive decrees to move a radical agenda that the American people don’t support. If his agenda is popular, get the Congress to pass it. Ruling by executive decree is not a sustainable path. Authoritarianism may be desired by Saul Alinsky and other radicals, but not by mainstream Americans.
  2. Above the law vs. Accountable to the law: Sustaining the Rule of Law means Americas laws apply equally to every American. Hillary Clinton has the well-deserved reputation of being Above the Law. Most Americans believe Hillary is untrustworthy.
    1. Hillary lawlessness
      1. Emails/FBI: Hillary repeatedly lied to the American People about her email server scandal.
      2. Clinton Cash: Overpowering evidence of corruption, money for favors.
    2. Obama Executive overreach, ignoring Judicial rulings
      1. Targeting Citizens/Groups (FBI, True the Vote, Comply or get targeted)
    3. Sanctuary Cities: Sanctuary cities are Democrat Party concoctions taunting the Nations immigration laws. If immigration laws can so easily be broken without consequence, why would anybody obey the rest of Americas laws? Precedent does matter.

These Are The 3 Big 2016 Election Issues

rp_343744229_150_150.jpgPart I: Sustaining America’s Safety:

The 2016 election is about 3 issues critical to sustaining America for today’s and tomorrow’s Americans.

  • The Number 1 Issue in the 2016 presidential election is sustaining Americans’ safety within our borders. The list of recent radical Islamic terrorist mass murders includes Orlando, San Bernardino, Chattanooga, Boston, Washington DC Navy Yard, and Fort Hood to name a few. A much longer list can be found here. This list details 2016 attacks only. In addition to threats from radical Islamists, there are radical forces gaining ground in our inner cities. There were over 300 murders in Chicago alone in 2016 so far, over 2 per day. The police pull back out of fear that they may end up behind bars for aggressive enforcement (known as the Ferguson Effect). The Dallas Police massacre, brought on by radical elements in Black Lives Matter, the Peoples New Black Panther Party and The Black Power Political Organization. This fear reaches across the nation, and is due to Obama administration policies targeting police over criminals. The rules of engagement for our law enforcement at home are now as ridiculous as the ones for our military overseas.
  • Fear is a powerful motivator, and sadly in America and the Western world today, terrorism is on the rise causing fear of intimidation, assaults, rapes and murders. Policies that keep all Americans safe will resonate, and those that imperil all Americans will repel. The key in 2016 is to clearly articulate the first from the second.
    • Open Borders/Unchecked Immigration: America’s open borders contribute directly to the growing dangers in our country. Democrat policies encourage illegal immigration and sanctuary cities, dissuade law enforcement and border patrol officers from actively enforcing the Nations immigration laws and actively settle millions of illegal aliens throughout America. No sane Nation would allow this, let alone encourage it, but Democrats do. Given the shear numbers of illegal immigrants, there are no doubt significant numbers of drug cartel members, Mexican, Central and South American gang members, and radical Islamic terrorists among them, and they put all American lives and our way of life at risk.
    • NOTE: The GOP establishment supports open immigration as well, and twice failed pushing comprehensive immigration reform (a.k.a. amnesty) through.
    • National Identity/Sovereignty: America’s national identity is imperiled. The longer unchecked immigration continues, the greater the odds America will lose its unique, and beautiful national identity and eventually its sovereignty. A nation without borders is not a nation at all. Both disdain for open borders illegal immigration and its impact on how deeply Americans feel about maintaining our heritage have already dramatic impacted in the GOP primary, and will be a huge factor in the general election.
    • NOTE: The recent BREXIT referendum proved how powerful self-determination is, even in Europe.
    • Safety in EU also at stake: Safety in the EU is even more at risk than here in America. Recent radical Islamic terrorist massacres across Europe in Paris, Brussels, Norway, Germany etc. show the dangers of open borders, lack of immigrant vetting, and a EU autocratic dictates. Women are more at risk of sexual assaults and rapes as the un-vetted immigrants bring anti-western values into the heart of the west. If Europe implodes, Americans face the repercussions, having fought twice in the 1900s to return stability there.
    • US greatest force for good in world history, Obama Apologetics: America is the greatest force for good in the history of the world. It is exceptional. That’s not to say that America is perfect. Nothing created by the hand of man is perfect. President Obama spouts radical progressive teachings in an attempt to compare America’s faults to the utopian ideals of disguised Marxism and socialism. That comparison is at the heart of the Common Core Agenda being forced into America’s schools. Common Core isn’t a curricula, it’s more propaganda meant to turn American youth against their country. Saul Alinsky would be proud.

More “Clinton Speak” From Hillary

Hillary Clinton Delivering Campaign Speach

Hillary Clinton Delivering Campaign Speech

America got another dose of “Clinton Speak” on 2 July when Chuck Todd interviewed Hillary Clinton on Meet The Press, and asked her:

CHUCK TODD: “Let me ask you this, your husband made an unannounced visit to the attorney general on the tarmac in Arizona. I’m curious of your initial reaction when you found out the news”

First, its telling that Todd asked about her initial reaction, and she spoke to her initial reaction. The interview was days after Bill Clinton and Loretta Lynch held their secret meeting. Why didn’t Todd ask her about what she knew now? Why not ask her what her husband told her regarding the meeting? Why not ask about the questions that she asked her husband as to what he was thinking?

Because of the question, Hillary had an easy “Clinton Speak” answer:

HILLARY CLINTON: “Well, I learned about it in the news and it was a short, chance meeting at an airport tarmac and on both of their planes, as I understand it, were landing on the same tarmac at about the same time and the Attorney General’s husband was there. They said hello. They talked about grandkids, which is very much on our minds these days, golf, their mutual friend and former attorney general Janet Reno. It was purely social. They did not veer off of speaking about those kinds of, you know, very common exchanges.”

Hillary should be the world’s authority on what happened. It involved her husband, impacted an FBI investigation the she was the target for, was headline news for most of a week, and cast shadows on her presidential election bid.

Instead, she finished with her understanding from the news reports:

HILLARY CLINTON: “Well I think, you know, hindsight is 20/20. Both the Attorney General and my husband have said they wouldn’t do it again, even though it was from all accounts that I have heard and seen, an exchange of pleasantries”

Why is it so hard to get a straight answer from the Clintons? Could it be because they have so much to hide?