The Communist Manifesto – Top 10 Most Notorious Elements

Karl Marx - German Philosopher and Father of Marxism

Karl Marx – German Philosopher and Father of Marxism

This primer summarizes the key points in Karl Marx (18 May 1818 – 14 March 1883) and Friedrich Engels’ (28 November 1820 – 5 August 1895) infamous 1848 work, and the resulting political movement that slaughtered an estimated 100+ million people across the planet. It is also the ideological predecessor of the teachings of Saul Alinsky, the father of America’s radical progressive movement.

Despite the fall of the Soviet Union, Communism, Marxism and Socialism are alive and growing internationally, including growing in strength within the United States.

1. The Communist Manifesto was written by Communists of “various nationalities” with the intent of:

  1. “Openly, in the face of the whole world, publish their views, aims, …tendencies”
  2. “In short, the Communists everywhere support revolutionary movement against the existing social and political order of things.”
  3. “They openly declare that their ends can be attained only by the forcible overthrow of all existing social conditions”

2. “General Intent Across All Countries”

  1. Abolition of property in land and application of all rents of land to public purposes.
  2. *A heavy and progressive or graduated income tax.
  3. Abolition of all right of inheritance. (Death Tax in the U.S.)
  4. Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels.
  5. Centralization of credit in the hands of the State, by means of a national bank with State capital and an exclusive monopoly. (Nearly all student loans are now owned by the Federal Government).
  6. Centralization of the means of communication and transport in the hands of the State.
  7. Extension of factories and instruments of production owned by the State.
  8. Equal liability of all to labor. Establishment of industrial armies, especially for agriculture.
  9. Combination of agriculture with manufacturing industries; gradual abolition of the distinction between town and country, by a more equitable distribution of the population over the country. (President Obama’s efforts to distribute populations across the U.S. through immigration and HUD policies)
  10. *Free education for all children in public schools. Destroy home education by socializing education.

*Fully instituted within the U.S.

3. Communist Foundational Premise:

World History is the history of class struggles, oppressors vs oppressed, in constant opposition to one another. The oppressors hoarded civilizations wealth, while the oppressed toiled under the oppressors for meager cash payment.

  • Named modern oppressors the “Bourgeois”.
  • Named modern oppressed the “Proletariat”.

4. The Bourgeois is responsible for all of humanity’s ills, including:

  1. Stripping every occupation (including professionals) into paid wage laborers, reducing them to slaves.
  2. Craftsmen were reduced to unskilled machine operators.
  3. Reduction of the family relation to a mere money relation.
  4. “Compels all nations to adopt the Bourgeois mode of production…” creating a world after “…its own image”.
  5. Massive global productive expansion that created an “…epidemis of over-production”.
  6. The strength advantage of male laborers over women was eliminated by modern industrial machinery.

“…not only has the Bourgeois forged the weapons that bring death to itself; it has also called into existence the men who are to wield those weapons-the modern working class-the proletarians.”

5. Every class struggle is a political struggle.

The struggle between Bourgeois and Proletariat grows from localized struggles, into trade unions with national struggles, and eventually global revolution, where the Proletariat inevitably overthrows the Bourgeois.

“The Communists do not form a separate party opposed to other working-class parties”.

Communists ally themselves with numerous parties who oppose the bourgeoisies in “…whatever country they are in”.

6. Communists believe themselves above the working-class parties of every country:

They are the “…most-advanced and resolute understand the line of march the conditions and results of the proletarian movement”.

7. The Stated Theory of Communism: “The abolition of private property.”

Capital is a collective product only by the united action of all members of society, can it be set in motion. Bares eerie resemblance to President Obama’s comment “If you’ve got a business, you didn’t build that. Somebody else made that happen.”

“Capital is a social power and should be converted into common property.”

“The average price of wage-labour is the minimum wage”. Described as requisite in bare existence as a laborer.

Freedom under bourgeois means “…free trade, free selling and buying”. Communists intend to do away with buying and selling, and property. Disagrees with the argument that once private property is abolished, that all work will cease, and universal laziness will take hold.

8. Communists intend to abolish the family, believing bourgeois poisoned the family’s foundation. Disgusted with the “…hallowed co-relation of parent and child.” Does Hillary Clinton’s book, It Takes a Village, have it’s root philosophy in this marxist concept?

Look at marriage with disdain, as it is also corrupted by the bourgeois. Want to create an openly legalized community of women.

9. Intend to abolish countries and nationality. Is this what Obama is doing by subverting U.S. sovereignty to international actors? Is the leftist UN global government intent a manifestation of this?

10. Communism abolishes eternal truths, all religion, all morality.

The proletariat will use its political supremacy to wrest all capital from the bourgeoisie, to centralize all instruments of production in the hands of the State; i.e. of the proletariat organized as the “ruling class”.

Noted Author Trevor Loudon’s discussion of communist Influence, and the devious means used to expand it.

Abolition of all morality looks like Saul Alinsky’s 11 Rules of Ethics of Means and Ends

Examples of Communist Influence In US:

Examples of Democrat Party Leaders Unable to Differentiate Socialist From Democrats:

Top 10 “Must Read” News Stories of the Week

  1. GOP Looking Into Charges of Systemic Climate Data Tampering

2. Communism’s Latest Failure

3. Nanny State on the Rise

4. A Sleeping Russian Bear No More

5. White House looking to open America’s doors to Syrian Immigrants

6. Mayor Giuliani speaks to President Obama’s Communist Roots

YouTube Videos of Noted Author Trevor Loudon exposing Communism in the USA

7. Texas Judge Puts Brakes On Obamagration

8. Congressional Budget Office’s Latest Forecast on America’s Future

9. Obamacare Law Unilaterally Changed Again

10. Latest Embarising DHS Intelligence Report: Look Out For Right Wing Americans

 

Caveat Emptor America!

Washington Monument, Washington D.C.

Washington Monument, Washington D.C.

Let the buyers beware! What would America look like if the Democrat Party were unchecked to enact every policy that it fights so hard to institute? The first places to look for answers are in the American cities that democrat politicians owned lock, stock, and barrel for decades.

According to the 2010 census, the top 10 poorest cities with greater than 250,000 people,

and the last year that they had a Republican mayor are:

  1. Detroit, MI. 32.5% below poverty level. (1961)
  2. Buffalo, NY. 29.9% below poverty level. (1954)
  3. Cincinnati, OH. 27.8% below poverty level. (1984)
  4. Cleveland, OH. 27.0% below poverty level. (1989)
  5. Miami, FL. 26.9% below poverty level. Never.
  6. St. Louis, MO. 26.8% below poverty level. (1949)
  7. El Paso, TX. 26.4% below poverty level. Never.
  8. Milwaukee, WI. 26.2% below poverty level. (1908)
  9. Philadelphia, PA. 25.1% below poverty level. (1952)
  10. Newark, NJ. 24.2% below poverty level. (1907)

Source: www.examiner.com

All of these cities owe their poverty to Democrats. Pictures of Detroit, for example, show the totality of the betrayal to both the citizens of these cities, and the rest of America, for their decay weakens us all.

Now that the Detroit visual is clear in your mind, what other “wonderful” Democrat Party, America transforming policies would we suffer from?

  • America’s borders would remain wide open to anybody, from any country, with any intent who wished to enter.
  • Democratic politicians would continue to welcome illegal immigrants onto America’s welfare rolls, enabling them to illegally vote (6.4 percent of non-citizens voted in 2008 and 2.2 percent of non-citizens voted in 2010), and eventually grant them citizenship. America is, after all, responsible for stealing the rest of the world’s wealth, Democrat political ideologues say.
  • America’s energy wealth would be locked up in favor of expensive imported energy, and anemic renewables.
  • American wealth would be sent to other countries as carbon tax penalties.
  • In order to become more efficient, Americans would be crowded into major urban centers, as most of our land would be turned over to mother nature. These desires are engrained under the name Agenda 21.
  • Government intrusion into every facet of life would go unchecked. So many are already here (from government salt bans to mandating your light bulbs and how much your toilet can use).
  • Obama care would quickly give way to socialized medicine. Quality medical care would be a thing of the past, in favor of equally poor, VA style medical treatment for all.
  • Christianity would be relegated to a back room religion, in favor of statism, along the lines of every communist country on earth.

These are just the beginning, unfortunately. At it’s fullest, and completely unchecked level, progressive Democrat policies would create an America that looked like Cuba, Venezuela, or any other communist country. This may sound extreme to some, but that doesn’t change the facts. Look at who controls the money flowing into the Democrat Party, and you’ll see the ones calling the shots, and setting their agenda.

Trevor Loudon’s nearly 700-page book, The Enemies Within, details the growing Marxist, communist and progressive influences in the Democrat Party. View videos of Mr. Loudon making the case agains the Democrat Party. Elections in America are no longer a question of policies; they are a question of liberty vs. statism. We now see Sen Bernie Sanders, Socialist, running for the Democratic presidential nomination. The fact that he can even run shows how dramatically the Democrat Party moved to the left!